The sixteen law reviews you should follow on Twitter

Last year at PrawfsBlawg, I blogged about a Twitter census of law reviews. I've maintained a Twitter list of law reviews. But I thought I'd do a little analysis of these law reviews.

Twitter remains one of the easiest places for me to find and aggregate journal content. I use Feedly extensively for blogs and other RSS-friendly places, but I've found that many law reviews lack an RSS, or the process of inputting them all one at a time to be laborious. Concurring Opinions continues to host law review tables of contents (which I find one of the most valuable contributions to legal blogging), but, as boards turn over year after year, few still use the service. Sadly, it's almost as if law reviews don't want people easily finding and reading what they publish.

I looked at the flagship law reviews at the 108 law schools with a U.S. News & World Report peer score of 2.2 or higher. If I found their Twitter accounts, I included them. I then examined how many tweets they had, how many followers they had, and when their last tweet (not a retweet) took place.

As it is, there are only 64 of these journals that even have a Twitter account. And that includes accounts that have as few as zero tweets.

So I then created a benchmark: the law reviews worth following are those with at least 100 tweets, at least 100 followers, and at least one tweet in the last 30 days. I thought that would be a pretty minimal standard for level of engagement and recency of engagement. This 100/100/30 standard reduces the list to 16 accounts worth following:

Yale Law Journal

Harvard Law Review

Columbia Law Review

Chicago Law Review

NYU Law Review

California Law Review

Michigan Law Review

Penn Law Review

Texas Law Review

Iowa Law Review

Ohio State Law Journal

Fordham Law Review

Washington Law Review

American Law Review

Pepperdine Law Review

UALR Law Review

A majority are "top 15" law reviews, which shows that the higher-quality schools tend to have a more active and engaged social media presence. Indeed, the Penn Law Review has been praised for its social media presence.Alas, law review editorial boards turn over annually, and so many of these accounts have fallen into disuse, including one I've praised before.

Below is the complete list, with 100/100/30 law reviews highlighted. If you see a journal not listed, tweet me about it @derektmuller.

Peer score Journal Tweets Followers Last tweet (not RT)
4.8 @YaleLJournal 525 3400 May 6, 2014
4.8 @HarvLRev 476 11.9K April 18, 2014
4.7 @StanLRev 246 2673 January 15, 2014
4.6 @ColumLRev 140 967 May 12, 2014
4.6 @UChiLRev 204 1759 May 15, 2014
4.4 @nyulawreview 946 2789 May 4, 2014
4.4 @CalifLRev 237 1129 May 12, 2014
4.4 @michlawreview 125 837 May 19, 2014
4.3 @PennLawReview 225 830 May 8, 2014
4.3 @VirginiaLawRev 12 137 April 9, 2014
4.2 @DukeLawJournal 9 554 April 7, 2014
4.1 @NULRev 56 145 May 16, 2014
4.1 @Cornell_Law_Rev 1 496 July 21, 2010
4.1 @GeorgetownLJ 14 313 October 29, 2013
4.0 @TexasLRev 239 962 May 16, 2014
3.9 @UCLALawReview 99 1217 April 30, 2014
3.8 Vanderbilt  
3.6 Washington (St. Louis)  
3.5 @MinnesotaLawRev 21 58 May 11, 2014
3.5 @SCalLRev 5 48 May 9, 2013
3.5 North Carolina  
3.4 Emory  
3.4 George Washington  
3.4 @NotreDameLawRev 10 80 April 16, 2014
3.4 @UCDavisLawRev 32 137 October 5, 2012
3.3 @BULawReview 493 599 February 28, 2014
3.3 Wisconsin  
3.2 William & Mary  
3.2 @IowaLawReview 186 658 May 17, 2014
3.2 Indiana (Bloomington)  
3.2 @OhioStateLJ 154 552 May 12, 2014
3.2 @BCLawReview 258 711 April 1, 2014
3.2 @fordhamlrev 232 929 May 13, 2014
3.2 Washington & Lee  
3.1 @AlaLawReview 2 150 January 11, 2013
3.1 @WashLawReview 106 508 May 16, 2014
3.1 @GaLRev 3 60 February 13, 2014
3.1 @WFULawReview 238 228 April 11, 2014
3.1 @arizlrev 31 167 April 2, 2013
3.1 @UIllLRev 78 451 May 16, 2014
3.1 @UFLawReview 125 306 October 28, 2013
3.1 @HastingsLJ 43 139 April 22, 2014
3.0 Arizona State  
3.0 Colorado  
3.0 @TulaneLawReview 39 362 May 2, 2014
2.9 BYU  
2.9 Florida State  
2.9 Maryland  
2.8 Utah  
2.8 @ConnLRev 28 434 March 18, 2014
2.8 @CardozoLRev 50 603 April 29, 2014
2.8 @AmULRev 115 392 April 29, 2014
2.7 George Mason  
2.7 @TempleLawReview 27 81 December 17, 2012
2.7 @UMLawReview 13 345 February 14, 2014
2.7 San Diego  
2.7 @OregonLawReview 5 172 March 12, 2012
2.6 SMU  
2.6 @PeppLawReview 579 452 May 14, 2014
2.6 Houston  
2.6 @CaseWResLRev 799 539 March 26, 2014
2.6 @denverlawreview 19 196 May 17, 2014
2.6 @ukanlrev 96 405 May 2, 2014
2.6 Tennessee  
2.6 @PittLawReview 0 2 n/a
2.6 Loyola (Los Angeles)  
2.5 Richmond  
2.5 Nebraska  
2.5 @KYLawJournal 17 111 March 20, 2012
2.5 Oklahoma  
2.5 Georgia State  
2.5 Missouri (Columbia)  
2.5 @LUCLawJournal 167 86 April 22, 2014
2.5 Chicago-Kent  
2.5 Brooklyn  
2.4 Baylor  
2.4 @pennstatim 27 125 September 18, 2013
2.4 Lewis & Clark  
2.4 New Mexico  
2.4 Cincinnati  
2.4 @RutgersLJ 12 412 May 2, 2014
2.4 @RutgersLRev 49 427 May 15, 2014
2.4 Indiana (Indianapolis)  
2.4 Marquette  
2.4 Hawaii  
2.4 Santa Clara  
2.3 @arklawrev 156 1680 February 17, 2014
2.3 @SHULawReview 22 113 January 28, 2014
2.3 @NevLawJournal 18 27 April 8, 2014
2.3 @MichStLRev 202 373 April 11, 2014
2.3 Seattle  
2.3 @nuljournal 28 200 May 5, 2014
2.3 @SCLawReview 305 536 April 11, 2014
2.3 @VillanovaLawRev 1 33 April 14, 2014
2.3 SUNY (Buffalo)  
2.3 Catholic  
2.3 @SyracuseLRev 20 75 May 7, 2014
2.3 DePaul  
2.2 @lalawreview 40 308 April 30, 2014
2.2 Louisville  
2.2 Mississippi  
2.2 @UMKCLawReview 0 3 n/a
2.2 @GonzagaLawRev 75 78 May 16, 2014
2.2 St. John's  
2.2 @UALRLawReview 210 338 April 23, 2014
2.2 @MaineLawReview 65 247 May 19, 2014
2.2 Hofstra  
2.2 @HULawJournal 331 295 April 9, 2014